Comments on: Woo-Hoo! http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/ THIS BLOG IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. We've retired this blog, but the GifS gang is now active at Atheist Oasis (atheistoasis.wordpress.com). Visit us there! Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:44:32 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: God is for Suckers! » Blog Archive » Because In Most Cases, It IS Biological, Not Ideological http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418511 God is for Suckers! » Blog Archive » Because In Most Cases, It IS Biological, Not Ideological Sun, 19 Apr 2009 06:50:47 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418511 [...] it seems that some folks have been picking fights with me. There was a ridiculous brouhaha here, which led to a severe misdiagnosis of my present mental state. Following this, I actually got [...] [...] it seems that some folks have been picking fights with me. There was a ridiculous brouhaha here, which led to a severe misdiagnosis of my present mental state. Following this, I actually got [...]

]]>
By: Stardust http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418091 Stardust Sun, 12 Apr 2009 18:36:26 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418091 Yes, agreed KA. It is getting tedious. This "flame-baiting" and "poisoning the well" by some is getting old and he seems to be enjoying it over at his blog. Time to let it all die down now and ignore whatever falsehoods he wants to say on his own blog in an attempt to stir up traffic to his site (As well as turn us against each other on our own site. That is not cool. ) The horse is dead, as the saying goes. Time to move on from here. Yes, agreed KA. It is getting tedious. This “flame-baiting” and “poisoning the well” by some is getting old and he seems to be enjoying it over at his blog. Time to let it all die down now and ignore whatever falsehoods he wants to say on his own blog in an attempt to stir up traffic to his site (As well as turn us against each other on our own site. That is not cool. ) The horse is dead, as the saying goes. Time to move on from here.

]]>
By: Krystalline Apostate http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418045 Krystalline Apostate Sun, 12 Apr 2009 02:17:21 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418045 Lynda: <blockquote>Yes, I was vague. I did mean Old Git. No, you won’t get rid of me from GifS so easily. I have an extremely tough skin having dealt with many bullies over my lifetime. They don’t bother me. I can just quit reading your comments if I wish to continue enjoying the more creative and intellectually stimulating views of other commentators here. Lickity split! No harm done to me. I’m sure your contributions will hardly be missed.</blockquote> Then quit harping on it. I'm not going anywhere anytime soon. Makes little spittle to me - I do this for free. <blockquote>As long as someone else was addressing my comments and I decided to respond to their statements one can properly call it “communication” or “discussion”, which hardly indicates OCD. As a commentator here you should be slightly familiar with the process. If I had a therapist I’d recommend him/her to you.</blockquote> Oh wow, I misdiagnosed you! Did it irritate you in the slightest? Imagine how I felt when accused of something as idiotic as 'revering' a comic book character. I can hear your voice now (in the imitation of Vera Demilo: "Oh, but you used the c-word & threatened to punch him. You're wrong, no matter what now!" Honestly, I don't give anybody free passes. You talk stupid to me, I'll tell you about it. You accuse me of stupid crap, you'll get an honest response. I don't care if you're an old man, a woman, or what. NO FREE PASSES. Here's my other yardstick: I won't say anything online that I wouldn't say to your face. I'm not a hypocrite, a coward, or a bully. Your inability to see this doesn't impress me in the slightest. Anyways, this is getting tedious. Lynda:

Yes, I was vague. I did mean Old Git. No, you won’t get rid of me from GifS so easily. I have an extremely tough skin having dealt with many bullies over my lifetime. They don’t bother me. I can just quit reading your comments if I wish to continue enjoying the more creative and intellectually stimulating views of other commentators here. Lickity split! No harm done to me. I’m sure your contributions will hardly be missed.

Then quit harping on it. I’m not going anywhere anytime soon. Makes little spittle to me – I do this for free.

As long as someone else was addressing my comments and I decided to respond to their statements one can properly call it “communication” or “discussion”, which hardly indicates OCD. As a commentator here you should be slightly familiar with the process. If I had a therapist I’d recommend him/her to you.

Oh wow, I misdiagnosed you! Did it irritate you in the slightest? Imagine how I felt when accused of something as idiotic as ‘revering’ a comic book character.
I can hear your voice now (in the imitation of Vera Demilo: “Oh, but you used the c-word & threatened to punch him. You’re wrong, no matter what now!”
Honestly, I don’t give anybody free passes. You talk stupid to me, I’ll tell you about it. You accuse me of stupid crap, you’ll get an honest response. I don’t care if you’re an old man, a woman, or what. NO FREE PASSES.
Here’s my other yardstick: I won’t say anything online that I wouldn’t say to your face. I’m not a hypocrite, a coward, or a bully.
Your inability to see this doesn’t impress me in the slightest.
Anyways, this is getting tedious.

]]>
By: stardust http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418021 stardust Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:44:12 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418021 <i>I’m sure your contributions will hardly be missed.</i> Lynda, I am speaking as KA's fellow moderator from a neutral standpoint in all this, and I and many others here appreciate his "Sunday Sermons" which he puts great work and effort into, and yes...those would be missed my many of us. And Lynda, despite what TOG wants to make it appear at his site, I for one harbor no "hostility" towards you for standing up for him. After all, you aren't aware of the circumstances of his first leaving. Putting all this aside, Lynda, your comments and your own perspectives on topics add much to our discussions. If TOG wants to comment further, he is not blocked or banned and he does have people who enjoy reading his comments. He is free to comment here if he wishes. If he chooses to storm off in a huff again (only this time he can't make a mess of the archives, thank goodness! ;) ), then that is sad, but his choice. (And as for TOG suggesting that his comments are being deleted, I can assure you that they have <strong>not</strong> been as I am pretty much the only one who does "housekeeping" of that sort around here. The only comments deleted are advertisements in the spam folder, and the occasional fundie Xian or Muslim who comes by to tell us we are going to burn in Hell. ) I think that most everyone has moved on to new topics and aren't even interested in this post anymore. So, we should just move on from here. We all need to be less touchy here. I’m sure your contributions will hardly be missed.

Lynda, I am speaking as KA’s fellow moderator from a neutral standpoint in all this, and I and many others here appreciate his “Sunday Sermons” which he puts great work and effort into, and yes…those would be missed my many of us.

And Lynda, despite what TOG wants to make it appear at his site, I for one harbor no “hostility” towards you for standing up for him. After all, you aren’t aware of the circumstances of his first leaving. Putting all this aside, Lynda, your comments and your own perspectives on topics add much to our discussions.

If TOG wants to comment further, he is not blocked or banned and he does have people who enjoy reading his comments. He is free to comment here if he wishes. If he chooses to storm off in a huff again (only this time he can’t make a mess of the archives, thank goodness! ;) ), then that is sad, but his choice.

(And as for TOG suggesting that his comments are being deleted, I can assure you that they have not been as I am pretty much the only one who does “housekeeping” of that sort around here. The only comments deleted are advertisements in the spam folder, and the occasional fundie Xian or Muslim who comes by to tell us we are going to burn in Hell. )

I think that most everyone has moved on to new topics and aren’t even interested in this post anymore. So, we should just move on from here. We all need to be less touchy here.

]]>
By: stardust http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418020 stardust Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:33:39 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418020 <i>I guess we’re ALL a bit too sensitive, at times, for our own good.</i> ChuckA, I agree. This whole "warring" over a mere image is a bit ridiculous. We should be able to respectfully disagree without being condescending, hateful and personal attacks towards each other in our little clubhouse here. It's been a long time since there has been this sort of exchange amongst fellow atheists. I hope in the future we all can agree to disagree without being so touchy about it. The good news in the copy of the post has been lost in a heated debate over a fictional character, just proving that if it isn't religion humans will fight with each other about other things. It will always be something. I guess we’re ALL a bit too sensitive, at times, for our own good.

ChuckA, I agree. This whole “warring” over a mere image is a bit ridiculous. We should be able to respectfully disagree without being condescending, hateful and personal attacks towards each other in our little clubhouse here. It’s been a long time since there has been this sort of exchange amongst fellow atheists. I hope in the future we all can agree to disagree without being so touchy about it. The good news in the copy of the post has been lost in a heated debate over a fictional character, just proving that if it isn’t religion humans will fight with each other about other things. It will always be something.

]]>
By: Lynda http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418017 Lynda Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:18:01 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418017 KA, Yes, I was vague. I did mean Old Git. No, you won't get rid of me from GifS so easily. I have an extremely tough skin having dealt with many bullies over my lifetime. They don't bother me. I can just quit reading your comments if I wish to continue enjoying the more creative and intellectually stimulating views of other commentators here. Lickity split! No harm done to me. I'm sure your contributions will hardly be missed. As long as someone else was addressing my comments and I decided to respond to their statements one can properly call it "communication" or "discussion", which hardly indicates OCD. As a commentator here you should be slightly familiar with the process. If I had a therapist I'd recommend him/her to you. KA,
Yes, I was vague. I did mean Old Git. No, you won’t get rid of me from GifS so easily. I have an extremely tough skin having dealt with many bullies over my lifetime. They don’t bother me. I can just quit reading your comments if I wish to continue enjoying the more creative and intellectually stimulating views of other commentators here. Lickity split! No harm done to me. I’m sure your contributions will hardly be missed.
As long as someone else was addressing my comments and I decided to respond to their statements one can properly call it “communication” or “discussion”, which hardly indicates OCD. As a commentator here you should be slightly familiar with the process. If I had a therapist I’d recommend him/her to you.

]]>
By: Krystalline Apostate http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-418013 Krystalline Apostate Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:50:17 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-418013 Lynda: <blockquote>Also, I read your “apology” to Old Git. Not much of one, is it? At Old Git’s blog you threaten to hit him were he within striking distance which suggests you may need to consider anger management classes.</blockquote> Well, obviously, you need to work on reading comprehension. He said some of the most vile shit about me, & they WERE fighting words. In fact, I think they're actionable. <blockquote>I found your response to Old Git’s initial comments here very disturbing and I am fearful that someone with a great ability to think critically is no longer going to visit GifS as a result.</blockquote> I don't think that person is you, but okay. In fact, you're still fussing about that stupid picture, which is indicative of OCD. So, say hey to your therapist for me. Ta. Lynda:

Also, I read your “apology” to Old Git. Not much of one, is it? At Old Git’s blog you threaten to hit him were he within striking distance which suggests you may need to consider anger management classes.

Well, obviously, you need to work on reading comprehension. He said some of the most vile shit about me, & they WERE fighting words. In fact, I think they’re actionable.

I found your response to Old Git’s initial comments here very disturbing and I am fearful that someone with a great ability to think critically is no longer going to visit GifS as a result.

I don’t think that person is you, but okay. In fact, you’re still fussing about that stupid picture, which is indicative of OCD. So, say hey to your therapist for me.
Ta.

]]>
By: ChuckA http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2009/04/07/woo-hoo-2/comment-page-2/#comment-417999 ChuckA Sat, 11 Apr 2009 04:28:00 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/?p=5902#comment-417999 ^ Lynda...regarding your comment on the KA/TOG situation; I agree. First, I have to say that I really hate taking sides in these unpleasant situations. However... To me it's a perfect example of what can happen when people get into very PERSONAL ad hominem attacks. We do a lot of "at a distance" criticism and name calling here on GifS RE religions, politics, etc.; but it's a whole other issue when ESPECIALLY fellow atheist GifSters get to the point of flat out intellectual abuse...or worse...actual PHYSICAL threats. Even though we all, I assume, realize that it's a lot more egotistical bluster than any "real" threat; that doesn't diminish the unnecessary nastiness which somehow poisons...at least for THIS atheist...what has always been for me this Site's feeling of a welcoming oasis in the 'Internet Wilderness'. As you said, Lynda...and with only my slight variation, and immense sadness...I'm almost CERTAIN..."that someone with a great ability to think critically is no longer going to visit GifS as a result." AND I concur...that "This is a true shame..."! I, for one, will miss him greatly. I was very pleasantly surprised when he started commenting again, recently. I guess we're ALL a bit too sensitive, at times, for our own good. 'Nough said, I guess. And Lynda...from what I can gather from your contributions here at GifS...I'd say you DEFINITELY know quite a bit...and express it with a lot of "class" as well! ^ Lynda…regarding your comment on the KA/TOG situation; I agree.
First, I have to say that I really hate taking sides in these unpleasant situations.
However…
To me it’s a perfect example of what can happen when people get into very PERSONAL ad hominem attacks.
We do a lot of “at a distance” criticism and name calling here on GifS RE religions, politics, etc.; but it’s a whole other issue when ESPECIALLY fellow atheist GifSters get to the point of flat out intellectual abuse…or worse…actual PHYSICAL threats. Even though we all, I assume, realize that it’s a lot more egotistical bluster than any “real” threat; that doesn’t diminish the unnecessary nastiness which somehow poisons…at least for THIS atheist…what has always been for me this Site’s feeling of a welcoming oasis in the ‘Internet Wilderness’.
As you said, Lynda…and with only my slight variation, and immense sadness…I’m almost CERTAIN…”that someone with a great ability to think critically is no longer going to visit GifS as a result.”
AND I concur…that “This is a true shame…”!
I, for one, will miss him greatly. I was very pleasantly surprised when he started commenting again, recently.
I guess we’re ALL a bit too sensitive, at times, for our own good.
‘Nough said, I guess.

And Lynda…from what I can gather from your contributions here at GifS…I’d say you DEFINITELY know quite a bit…and express it with a lot of “class” as well!

]]>