Comments on: Fun with Mormons http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/ THIS BLOG IS NO LONGER ACTIVE. We've retired this blog, but the GifS gang is now active at Atheist Oasis (atheistoasis.wordpress.com). Visit us there! Thu, 22 Jul 2010 00:44:32 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Eve http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58455 Eve Thu, 31 Aug 2006 23:20:51 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58455 Taylor: Another popular excuse is that they married to ensure the financial well-being of the girls–a nice sentiment and all, but it doesn’t work that way– Imho, not even a "nice sentiment;" it's a great excuse to wriggle out of paying for a female to be educated and trained to support herself and thus be truly independent of men. Are there really women who swallow this crap? (Purely rhetorical question; of course I know there are - it just continues to boggle my mind!) Taylor: Another popular excuse is that they married to ensure the financial well-being of the girls–a nice sentiment and all, but it doesn’t work that way–

Imho, not even a “nice sentiment;” it’s a great excuse to wriggle out of paying for a female to be educated and trained to support herself and thus be truly independent of men. Are there really women who swallow this crap? (Purely rhetorical question; of course I know there are – it just continues to boggle my mind!)

]]>
By: Bean http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58203 Bean Thu, 31 Aug 2006 03:43:16 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58203 My best friend used to be Methodist. And normal. In 1994, some Mormon elders (i.e., boys) came by her house. They let them in. They kept coming back, they kept letting them in. I was there for all of this, but I was allowed to retreat to the back bedroom while they converted her entire family (I stayed there while my parents were at work during the summer). Within 3 months, all four members of her family had reached "acolyte" (??) status, or something similar. There was a bunch of studying and meetings, etc. Eventually they became full fledged members. However, the only time she saw Mormons was at church. Otherwise, she was with me (atheist) and our two Catholic friends. Religion was never part of our friendship except weddings and funerals. Everything was fine for years; nothing weird happened. We all went to college, graduated, got jobs, and were still friends (though geographically separated). We got together for a girls' weekend about 18 months ago in her home. When we arrived, we were informed for the first time that she was engaged. This was news to us, though it had happened months before. Not only was she engaged, but to a person we had never met, though she claimed he was her youth leader for years....That sentence should bother you. It bothered me when she said it. He's only 6-7 years older, but it is still odd. It's odd that we didn't know him, we'd never met him. She claimed she'd always "had a thing" for him. For those who don't know, Mormons can ONLY marry other Mormons, though she dated many non-Mormons previously. I still don't even know his name. Of course, it was a temple wedding so we weren't allowed...at our best friend's wedding. It's a little known fact, but she told me that during the temple ceremony she would pledge to obey her husband on penalty of death. Any religion requiring you to pledge allegience to someone or face death should send up warning signals (though it will be obvious to you guys). The big day came, she was married in the temple, she had a reception for those who couldn't attend the wedding, and <b>that's the last I've heard from or seen of her. Literally.</b> One of my friends said she is moving to South Carolina, to live near her husband's family. These are all classic signs of spousal abuse. And there's nothing I can do. She is entirely brainwashed into believing that this is all a good thing. If raised in that system, the belief that this pledge was binding would be real. And perhaps in the FLDS (?) it wasn't a threat of death, but a fact. Spousal abuse runs rampant in religious families, especially Mormons. Nothing would surprise me about them. I went to her church a few times to better understand my friend and they seemed harmless, but there was an underlying, ever-present creepiness during the service. And not just the normal icky feeling religious services give-off. My best friend used to be Methodist. And normal. In 1994, some Mormon elders (i.e., boys) came by her house. They let them in. They kept coming back, they kept letting them in. I was there for all of this, but I was allowed to retreat to the back bedroom while they converted her entire family (I stayed there while my parents were at work during the summer). Within 3 months, all four members of her family had reached “acolyte” (??) status, or something similar. There was a bunch of studying and meetings, etc. Eventually they became full fledged members. However, the only time she saw Mormons was at church. Otherwise, she was with me (atheist) and our two Catholic friends. Religion was never part of our friendship except weddings and funerals. Everything was fine for years; nothing weird happened. We all went to college, graduated, got jobs, and were still friends (though geographically separated). We got together for a girls’ weekend about 18 months ago in her home. When we arrived, we were informed for the first time that she was engaged. This was news to us, though it had happened months before. Not only was she engaged, but to a person we had never met, though she claimed he was her youth leader for years….That sentence should bother you. It bothered me when she said it. He’s only 6-7 years older, but it is still odd. It’s odd that we didn’t know him, we’d never met him. She claimed she’d always “had a thing” for him. For those who don’t know, Mormons can ONLY marry other Mormons, though she dated many non-Mormons previously. I still don’t even know his name.

Of course, it was a temple wedding so we weren’t allowed…at our best friend’s wedding. It’s a little known fact, but she told me that during the temple ceremony she would pledge to obey her husband on penalty of death. Any religion requiring you to pledge allegience to someone or face death should send up warning signals (though it will be obvious to you guys). The big day came, she was married in the temple, she had a reception for those who couldn’t attend the wedding, and that’s the last I’ve heard from or seen of her. Literally. One of my friends said she is moving to South Carolina, to live near her husband’s family. These are all classic signs of spousal abuse. And there’s nothing I can do. She is entirely brainwashed into believing that this is all a good thing.

If raised in that system, the belief that this pledge was binding would be real. And perhaps in the FLDS (?) it wasn’t a threat of death, but a fact. Spousal abuse runs rampant in religious families, especially Mormons. Nothing would surprise me about them. I went to her church a few times to better understand my friend and they seemed harmless, but there was an underlying, ever-present creepiness during the service. And not just the normal icky feeling religious services give-off.

]]>
By: jimmer http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58169 jimmer Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:46:12 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58169 Joe I remember hearing about the Spaulding papers in the early 70's It caused quite a stir in some communities when it was being profiled in the news. It just so happens that the news of that issue suddenly ended. One day people are talking about it and within a week it is over. No more news, nothing at all no follow up even. Weird as pajamas on a snake. Joe
I remember hearing about the Spaulding papers in the early 70’s It caused quite a stir in some communities when it was being profiled in the news. It just so happens that the news of that issue suddenly ended. One day people are talking about it and within a week it is over. No more news, nothing at all no follow up even. Weird as pajamas on a snake.

]]>
By: Taylor http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58119 Taylor Wed, 30 Aug 2006 17:46:07 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58119 Another popular excuse is that they married to ensure the financial well-being of the girls--a nice sentiment and all, but it doesn't work that way--poverty is worsened by polygamy, since there's only one working man trying to provide for 13+ wives who aren't allowed to do anything but stay at home. Anyway, once I had a seminary teacher tell me that the reason fossils were here is because this earth is "recycled" and gawd created it out of bits of his other projects, and dinosaur fossils are just pieces of his last creations--which doesn't make the least bit of sense, since if this planet was created out of chunks of other planets, then the fossils wouldn't be in such nice, progressive, chronological layers. We also wouldn't be able to trace the lineage of dinosaurs into modern creatures, but we can--crocodiles are still remarkably similar to their ancestors from several million years ago, and we can trace the small changes all the way back to those old fossils, which we shouldn't be able to if gawd just magicked them there and created crocodiles from scratch. When I called the seminary teacher on that and asked the dreaded, "why", he said I ought to pray about it. Since this was back when I was just barely questioning church lessons, I actually did go and pray about it, earnestly even. I didn't get an answer, though, so I asked the teacher again and he pulled the famous cop-out: "You just don't have enough faith". When I wasn't satisfied with that answer, he said, "Maybe gawd's just testing you." Moronic. Another popular excuse is that they married to ensure the financial well-being of the girls–a nice sentiment and all, but it doesn’t work that way–poverty is worsened by polygamy, since there’s only one working man trying to provide for 13+ wives who aren’t allowed to do anything but stay at home.

Anyway, once I had a seminary teacher tell me that the reason fossils were here is because this earth is “recycled” and gawd created it out of bits of his other projects, and dinosaur fossils are just pieces of his last creations–which doesn’t make the least bit of sense, since if this planet was created out of chunks of other planets, then the fossils wouldn’t be in such nice, progressive, chronological layers. We also wouldn’t be able to trace the lineage of dinosaurs into modern creatures, but we can–crocodiles are still remarkably similar to their ancestors from several million years ago, and we can trace the small changes all the way back to those old fossils, which we shouldn’t be able to if gawd just magicked them there and created crocodiles from scratch.
When I called the seminary teacher on that and asked the dreaded, “why”, he said I ought to pray about it. Since this was back when I was just barely questioning church lessons, I actually did go and pray about it, earnestly even. I didn’t get an answer, though, so I asked the teacher again and he pulled the famous cop-out: “You just don’t have enough faith”. When I wasn’t satisfied with that answer, he said, “Maybe gawd’s just testing you.”
Moronic.

]]>
By: Buffalodavid http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58074 Buffalodavid Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:04:27 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58074 "god took it back" uhhhh... yea. When you ask why... well gaud don't like to be tested, is the stock answer. Never mind that he sees nothing wrong with testing us with things like fossil records. "God put those fossils here to test our faith. " Well, I flunked out again. As to the subject of "plural marriage". The "Mother" Church changes its history like the Ministry of Truth in the novel 1984. NOW the offical word is that Uncle Joe married those women for thier protection. It was the custom then to marry widows so there would be a big strong man around to protect them. The record seems to show that an awful lot of women became widowed between the ages of 14 and 16. And still do. “god took it back”

uhhhh… yea.

When you ask why… well gaud don’t like to be tested, is the stock answer. Never mind that he sees nothing wrong with testing us with things like fossil records.

“God put those fossils here to test our faith. ” Well, I flunked out again.

As to the subject of “plural marriage”. The “Mother” Church changes its history like the Ministry of Truth in the novel 1984. NOW the offical word is that Uncle Joe married those women for thier protection. It was the custom then to marry widows so there would be a big strong man around to protect them.

The record seems to show that an awful lot of women became widowed between the ages of 14 and 16.

And still do.

]]>
By: Russman http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58067 Russman Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:46:03 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58067 I have family that are LDS and they've been working on me for years to become a member ( although the pressure has subsided since my cousins all have oodles of kids now and their heavenly family is taking shape). When I ask questions about their beliefs, the answers are vague and elusive at best. When my cousins got married (sealed) in the temple only parents and "special" people were allowed in which makes me wonder whether they're sacrificing goats or parading around in their blessed underwear inside the temple. I inquired once about what happened to the golden tablets that Joe Smith supposedly had; after all an artifact from 175 years ago of that importance should be still around. I was told "god took it back". So I asked why an omnipotent being would take back such irrefutable proof at the dawn of the scientific age when people were actually begining to seek answers about the world around them. That got them all stirred up but they couldn't really answer the question because "god hadn't revealed the answer" to them. I have asked other questions regarding their beliefs but I usually get answers that are based on "leap of faith" or "it wiil be revealed to you after you join the church". As anyone with reasonable intellegence will tell you, it's never good to find out the details after you're committed - but that's what LDS would like you to do. So question them at every turn and make those naive 19 year old guys that show up at your door squirm with a good atheistic debate. (Mess with them really well and they will mark your house off as hostile). And if they offer to help have them clean your gutters - And point out to them while they're up on the ladder that that may be as close to heaven as they'll ever get. I have family that are LDS and they’ve been working on me for years to become a member ( although the pressure has subsided since my cousins all have oodles of kids now and their heavenly family is taking shape). When I ask questions about their beliefs, the answers are vague and elusive at best. When my cousins got married (sealed) in the temple only parents and “special” people were allowed in which makes me wonder whether they’re sacrificing goats or parading around in their blessed underwear inside the temple. I inquired once about what happened to the golden tablets that Joe Smith supposedly had; after all an artifact from 175 years ago of that importance should be still around. I was told “god took it back”. So I asked why an omnipotent being would take back such irrefutable proof at the dawn of the scientific age when people were actually begining to seek answers about the world around them. That got them all stirred up but they couldn’t really answer the question because “god hadn’t revealed the answer” to them. I have asked other questions regarding their beliefs but I usually get answers that are based on “leap of faith” or “it wiil be revealed to you after you join the church”.

As anyone with reasonable intellegence will tell you, it’s never good to find out the details after you’re committed – but that’s what LDS would like you to do. So question them at every turn and make those naive 19 year old guys that show up at your door squirm with a good atheistic debate. (Mess with them really well and they will mark your house off as hostile). And if they offer to help have them clean your gutters – And point out to them while they’re up on the ladder that that may be as close to heaven as they’ll ever get.

]]>
By: Taylor http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58059 Taylor Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:54:38 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58059 Yup, and eventually the split formed the RLDS church. They also believed that the next prophet should be Joe's direct descendant, not just some appointed person...unfortunately they ran out of direct descendants, so now they're back where they started. Yup, and eventually the split formed the RLDS church. They also believed that the next prophet should be Joe’s direct descendant, not just some appointed person…unfortunately they ran out of direct descendants, so now they’re back where they started.

]]>
By: gravitybear http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/comment-page-1/#comment-58057 gravitybear Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:11:39 +0000 http://gods4suckers.net/archives/2006/08/29/fun-with-mormons/#comment-58057 I thought that Joseph Smith's first wife refused to go along with the 'revelation' about polygamy, seeing it for the self-serving lie it was. She, with some others who saw through the scheme, left and started their own Mormon church. It's been a while since I read it, so maybe I am remembering wrong, but this was in <i>Under the banner of heaven : a story of violent faith</i> by Jon Krakauer. I thought that Joseph Smith’s first wife refused to go along with the ‘revelation’ about polygamy, seeing it for the self-serving lie it was. She, with some others who saw through the scheme, left and started their own Mormon church.
It’s been a while since I read it, so maybe I am remembering wrong, but this was in Under the banner of heaven : a story of violent faith by Jon Krakauer.

]]>