The New England elite you speak of gave you your fucking Bill of Rights.

There are lots of other definitions of liberal out there besides Answers.com:

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: Fourth Edition. 2000.

liberal

SYLLABICATION: lib·er·al
PRONUNCIATION: lbr-l, lbrl
ADJECTIVE: 1a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry. b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

I fail to see your problem. Do you have a desire to continue the great traditions of authoritarianism, intolerance and bigotry? Or are you just flapping out of your asshole?

And if the conservative says if the liberal is for laissez-faire then why does the liberal support welfare and minimum wages so strongly? Isn’t that government intervention? This definition is simply a joke and doesn’t hold to scrutiny, why does the conservative support giving every living American’s recorded phone conversations over to the National Security Agency?

You dumb fucks talk about “small government” only when it means a few paltry programs to keep the poor with dinner on their tables. When it comes to fascist oppression of everyone who disagrees with your jingoistic/militant ways, it’s no-holds-barred.

Why do you bastards get so worked up over tiny social programs for the poor but say nothing about the trillions we spend on killing people? Why is that? It always boggles my fucking mind. Where is your fucking humanity?

I would agree that the right side of the farm is guilty of tainting the L word but it is very closed minded to give them full credit. The left side of the farm has done a fantastic job of allowing themselves, and the L word, to be a negative connotation. Could it be those who try to shout over speakers on college campuses who want to speak on non-liberal political ideas? Or maybe it is the hypocrisy of the New England elite who cry for the poor and minorities while living just as rich as any ‘Phant?

Simply saying “I am what this definition says I am” does not necessarily translate into “This is how they are coming across”, much less that said definition only encompasses one who is a liberal. So ONLY a liberal favors natural goodness, autonomy and favors civil and political liberties? Only the liberals want to protect us from arbitrary authority?

Oddly enought, if I capitalize Liberalsim I apparently get:

A 19th-century Protestant movement that favored free intellectual inquiry, stressed the ethical and humanitarian content of Christianity, and de-emphasized dogmatic theology.

This, however, really sets the tone:

Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change.

The liberal side of the Mule has done as must damage as the Religious Wrong has done to the ‘Phant party. Try to think of liberal in practice and not in theory.

Atheist liberals are especially hypocrite, since they praise the ruling class that marginalizes them, and they praise the democracy that gives the religious majority power to oppress them. To be an atheist liberal makes about as much sense as being a gay Christian.”

When the fuck did we ever “praise the ruling class that marginalizes” us? Oh, you’re talking about government itself right? So tell me this, you destroy government, what happens? People group together in tribes and thus a primitive government is formed. This primitive government is more brutal than anything we have today, and probably worse, now that we’ll have fucking nukes and other lovely toys of destruction laying around.

Why don’t you define what you think liberal means asshole, because I don’t recall anyone endorsing the form of liberal you’re describing. You seem to think we’re all about letting people tell us how to fucking live and groveling at the feet of tyrants. You apparently didn’t read the fucking post at all, you just saw some words endorsing liberal and went with your warped definitions. You essentially built and attacked a fucking strawman in your “direct refutation”.

“I guess it’s easier to snipe from afar than to defend your silly beliefs.”

Snipe from afar? Would you like us to send someone to your house with a shotgun or something asshole? This is the internet, I can guarantee most of us are pretty fucking far away from each other.

“It’s interesting that no liberal has dared to reply to my direct refutation of the “atheist liberal” foolishness.”

You made two fucking comments, one told us to shut up and that we were silly, the other had a link to your bullshit post that basically said the same bullshit as your first comment along with a bunch of strawman bullshit. You apparently think you’re the main focus of the comments section, why don’t you take a look around, we brushed your foolish bullshit aside early on in the comments, we’ve had bigger assholes to burn. You know, people that at least make some arguments, illogical they may be, rather than some strawmen and bullying.

Now lets think about this, atheism- no theism, no theological belief. Since there are no bullshit gods and the like, there is no reed to follow arbitrary mystical rules, only to maintain real rules to avoid real problems and pains- in other words, liberal. I have little clue what kind of fucking “liberal” you’re talking about.

You do your strawman/fucked up defintions argument thing all of the fucking time, you did it at kill the afterlife and twopercentco, now you’re doing again here. Find a new routine or learn how to think.