Last year, Bob posted on a survey of Xian teens and what they actually seemed to believe (see the post “Dumb-Ass Teen Believers”). Since then, the survey results have been turned into a book (Soul Searching : The Religious and Spiritual Lives of American Teenagers), and the authors have come up with a picture of the actual religious beliefs that they think dominates the world-view of of nominally Xian teens — and it’s not traditional Xianity. They call it “Moral therapeutic Deism”.
Of course, the serious Xians are very concerned by this. As a representative commentary American Family Association’s “Agape Press News” piece “God, Religion … Whatever — Are Our Churchgoing Youth Falling Away from the Faith?” puts it:
…the very thought that our children may be falling away from Christianity is — or should be — terrifying… What Soul Searching reveals is a generation of kids who claim to be Christian, but many of whose beliefs are not even remotely orthodox… [the researchers say] “Christianity is either degenerating into a pathetic version of itself or, more significantly, Christianity is actively being colonized and displaced by a quite different religious faith.”
So what is this “terrifying” and “pathetic” alternative of “Moralistic Therapeutic Deism”? Roughly, it’s “moralistic” not in the sense of having rigid moral judgements, but “because they see faith as being essentially related to mere [my emphasis] human goodness”. That is, according to Soul Searching, teens think “that central to living a good and happy life is being a good, moral person. That means being nice, kind, pleasant, respectful, responsible, at work on self-improvement, taking care of ones health, and doing ones best to be successful.”
Shit! No wonder they’re freaked out! If “mere” human goodness is the central goal of faith, then obviously all you have to do is get that “mere” goodness by some other means, and blammo! Faith smacked down with other old behavior-control tricks, like ice water enemas to stop masturbation.
Soul Searching paints a picture of teens who “do not view religion as necessary for anyone being good because they see many means to being good and many good non-religious people… [they] conclude that religion is a non-necessary condition for achieving one of [religion's] primary functions… [they] construct religion in non-essential terms, as an optional individual lifestyle choice that does indeed help many people but is certainly not itself ultimately necessary.”
As for “therapeutic”? That’s the idea that “faith is meant to make a person happy, and help him get through life — much as a therapist does”; according to the book, “what appears to be the actual dominant religion among U.S. teenagers is centrally about feeling good, happy, secure, at peace. It is about attaining subjective well-being, being able to resolve problems, and getting along amiably with other people.” Which obviously puts it in competition with Zoloft, I suppose. But in any case, the point of religious faith was absolutely not to make life harder; as the authors say, “our interviews almost never uncovered among teens was a view that religion summons people to embrace an obedience to truth regardless of the personal consequences or rewards.”
As for “deism”: By this, they mean to evoke the sense of a God who is uninvolved in person and day-to-day goings-on of the world — “often described by teens as ‘watching over everything from above’”, but not playing an active part.
Given all this, it’s no wonder that the serious Xians are worried by the idea that especially amount the youth, “a significant part of Christianity in the United States is actually only tenuously Christian in any sense that is seriously connected to the actual historical Christian tradition, but has rather substantially morphed into Christianity’s misbegotten step-cousin, Christian Moralistic Therapeutic Deism.” God is reduced to one possible psychological technique among many, which may help you in being happy and decent to others, but isn’t necessary, or the only way, to achieve that real good of happiness and decency.
So where do I sign up? Other than empirical matters about how successful this particular psychological trick is in the production of happy and morally decent lives (I think it’s far less good and comes with far more risks than most of them do, obviously), I’m mostly happy with all this.
There’s surely a slight downside for our side: By stripping God of much of the concrete reality that the traditional conception has, we as atheists may also lose some of the toeholds that ground good metaphysical arguments against theism. After all, the less you believe in God as a real entity of power, personality, goodness, knowledge, and fine hosting talents for the afterlife, the less you have nutty views that I can crush with the power of logic.
But that downside for the atheist seems more than made up for by the the pathetic emasculating and disempowering that God receives. If I can make God just one more competitor in the self-help business (as in “God is My Therapist”) I’ll be happy to take him on there. I might not be able to gut him whole with the problem of evil or the paradox or foreknowledge and freedom any more, but I’ll be happy to engage Him in a fair fight for human happiness and flourishing. Frankly, Prozac and Tony Robbins will kick his ass all the way back to the myths of ancient Galilee, where He belongs.movies banks brianamovies female ejaculation freemovies masturbationblowjob clips movieride sybian moviemovies shemalesex movie freemovies rape Map